Wednesday, 10 March 2010

British Parliamentary Committee Report

MPS URGE GOVERNMENT TO WITHDRAW NHS FUNDING AND MHRA LICENSING OF HOMEOPATHY

In a report published on 22nd February,2010 , the Science and Technology Committee concluded that the NHS should cease funding homeopathy. It also concluded that the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) should not allow homeopathic product labels to make medical claims without evidence of efficacy. As they are not medicines, homeopathic products should no longer be licensed by the MHRA.

The Committee carried out an evidence check to test if the Government’s policies on homeopathy were based on sound evidence. The Committee found a mismatch between the evidence and policy. While the Government acknowledges there is no evidence that homeopathy works beyond the placebo effect (where a patient gets better because of their belief in the treatment), it does not intend to change or review its policies on NHS funding of homeopathy.

The Committee concurred with the Government that the evidence base shows that homeopathy is not efficacious (that is, it does not work beyond the placebo effect) and that explanations for why homeopathy would work are scientifically implausible.

The Committee concluded-given that the existing scientific literature showed no good evidence of efficacy-that further clinical trials of homeopathy could not be justified.

In the Committee’s view, homeopathy is a placebo treatment and the Government should have a policy on prescribing placebos. The Government is reluctant to address the appropriateness and ethics of prescribing placebos to patients, which usually relies on some degree of patient deception. Prescribing of placebos is not consistent with informed patient choice-which the Government claims is very important-as it means patients do not have all the information needed to make choice meaningful.

Beyond ethical issues and the integrity of the doctor-patient relationship, prescribing pure placebos is bad medicine. Their effect is unreliable and unpredictable and cannot form the sole basis of any treatment on the NHS.

The report also examines the MHRA licensing regime for homeopathic products. The Committee is particularly concerned over the introduction of the National Rules Scheme (NRS) in 2006, as it allows medical indications on the basis of study reports, literature and homeopathic provings and not on the basis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) - the normal requirement for medicines that make medical claims.

The MHRA’s user-testing of the label for Arnica Montana 30C-the only product currently licensed under the NRS-was poorly designed, with some parts of the test little more than a superficial comprehension test of the label and other parts actively misleading participants to believe that the product contains an active ingredient.

The product labelling for homeopathic products under all current licensing schemes fails to inform the public that homeopathic products are sugar pills containing no active ingredients. The licensing regimes and deficient labelling lend a spurious medical legitimacy to homeopathic products.

The Chairman of the Committee, Phil Willis MP, said:"It sets an unfortunate precedent for the Department of Health to consider that the existence of a community which believes that homeopathy works is 'evidence' enough to continue spending public money on it. This also sends out a confused message, and has potentially harmful consequences. We await the Government's response to our report with interest.”

When will Indian government wake up to stop the scandal of homeopathy in India??

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

...sorry i donn...think so.. homoepathic remedies.. are not mere placebo.. der r things tht science was not able to prove bcoz of the lack of advanced mechaniry to go beyond nanno level.....wer it.. acts on dynamic plane.. since it has much followers..surely der would be somethng.. true in it.. and also from my exprience..mny diseases was permantly cured with out sproutng out of a new one...so this action .. is..not..much pleasng for health concerned..popultion....

Anonymous said...

no homoeopthy used not be banned... i have alredy exprinced it.. merits.. best healing art..no side effects ..gentle ,effective and permant cure...

Anonymous said...

It doesn't seem to be generally known but the Parliamentary Committee was a fraud, a fix.
Defenders of homeopathy were not invited until the last moment, given little time to prepare, but did a good job nevertheless.
Presumably, the members of the committee were not convinced by the anti-homeopathic zealotry of the chairman, because NONE of them voted for the report. Instead, two extra members were recruited AFTER the evidence hearings, just to support the vote. One member who had attended the hearings voted against, all the other committee members were not present at the final vote, or abstained.
This is all a matter of record.

How can anyone think that was an honest effort? So much for so-called scientific evidence, completely dishonest.